Obama supporters;Does you candidate not know there's a difference between Liability & Socia

In recent speeches, Democrat Presidential candidate Barack Hussein Obama has attempted to use the fact that STATES require drivers to purchase LIABILITY INSURANCE as a precondition for driving as some form of president for his claim to force the American people to pay into a FEDERAL SOCILIZED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM.

Putting aside the fact that the government is not know for its efficiency or domestic problem solving ability (Liberals, you do remember that your 鈥淲ar on Poverty鈥? run by the government, lead to skyrocketing taxes which subsequently drove small businesses out of business and caused poverty to worsen, right???), doesn鈥檛 Hussein Obama realize that there is a difference between LIABILITY INSURANCE and Socialized Hillarycare???

The liability insurance that most states require drivers to obtain does not protect the driver themselves, but anyone that driver might accidentally injure in an auto accident.

Obama supporters;Does you candidate not know there's a difference between Liability %26 Socialized Hillarycare?virus protection

Lets also note many Americans (especially New Yorkers) can choose NOT to own a vehicle.........and therefore are not subject to pay for insurance they don't need or want. Why would we accept a FORCED PROGRAM? Many Americans don't want insurance because they believe they are healthy and can pay as they go. It is their money / assets they are gambling with should a catastrophic medical event take place. I believe adults are capable of weighing the risks of being unisured. (And those who can't afford insurance get MEDICAID!) No one in this country is denied HEALTH CARE REGARDLESS OF INCOME OR ABILITY TO PAY!!!